AI
Thursday, July 21, 2011 1:15:12 PM
Okie dokie, it appears that strong support for Laidlaw's business operations will also rectify the severe problems for the stock.
That is a colossal mistake to think or believe the company's business operations can vindicate the PUBLIC SECURITY known as LLEG.
Laidlaw could land a trillion dollar contract for every State in the U.S.A. and that would not absolve the company from their past behaviors with the public stock.
Laidlaw Energy Group, Inc. is a New York corporation based in New York. Questions have arisen concerning the adequacy and accuracy of press releases concerning the company’s operations, the accuracy of its financial statements, and stock promoting activity by the company.
http://sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/2011/34-64612-o.pdf
The SEC believes and has EVIDENCE that Laidlaw disseminated inadequate and inaccurate press releases concerning the company's operations, and the SEC believes and has EVIDENCE that Laidlaw submitted inaccurate Financial Statements. The more severe offence is that the SEC believes and has EVIDENCE that Laidlaw illegally sold stock by stock promotion on false news releases and inaccurate Financials.
The SEC's actions are entirely about the STOCK and Laidlaw's conduct regarding the stock.
The SEC does not care if Laidlaw breeds hamsters to run the sawmill belts, sells toothpicks from wood products, converts wood chips to fuel energy, or lands the biggest biomass contracts on the planet....the SEC ONLY cares about the PUBLIC stock and Securities Violations.
To not comprehend the difference is perilous.
That is a colossal mistake to think or believe the company's business operations can vindicate the PUBLIC SECURITY known as LLEG.
Laidlaw could land a trillion dollar contract for every State in the U.S.A. and that would not absolve the company from their past behaviors with the public stock.
Laidlaw Energy Group, Inc. is a New York corporation based in New York. Questions have arisen concerning the adequacy and accuracy of press releases concerning the company’s operations, the accuracy of its financial statements, and stock promoting activity by the company.
http://sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/2011/34-64612-o.pdf
The SEC believes and has EVIDENCE that Laidlaw disseminated inadequate and inaccurate press releases concerning the company's operations, and the SEC believes and has EVIDENCE that Laidlaw submitted inaccurate Financial Statements. The more severe offence is that the SEC believes and has EVIDENCE that Laidlaw illegally sold stock by stock promotion on false news releases and inaccurate Financials.
The SEC's actions are entirely about the STOCK and Laidlaw's conduct regarding the stock.
The SEC does not care if Laidlaw breeds hamsters to run the sawmill belts, sells toothpicks from wood products, converts wood chips to fuel energy, or lands the biggest biomass contracts on the planet....the SEC ONLY cares about the PUBLIC stock and Securities Violations.
To not comprehend the difference is perilous.
To bite the worm of incite is to bite the HOOK of the antagonist . They win .
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
