Good grief people, let's take this a little slower.
There was a bunch of newsletters sent out Monday...can we all agree on that? I hope so.
MomentumHunter.com and EastwindResearch.com are the names of those newsletters. Agreed.
If you go to MomentumHunter.com and EastwindResearch.com's webpages and read their disclaimers, you will see that they are compensated to feature different stock issues. Here's where it gets dicey because not everybody will agree with this. Maybe they featured KBLB out of the goodness of their heart. Who can guess how some people think. KBLB is no longer the featured company on either of the sites, so the disclaimer specifically for KBLB has been removed. How convenient for our discussion.
Can we agree that the reason to pay for exposure of this kind is to create a selling environment? Probably not. If a third party paid for this exposure, a common sense conclusion is that they didn't do it to expose the company to potential investors, but rather to create a selling environment. Probably won't be able to agree on that. Such is life. If Thompson/Hansel paid for it, then it very well could be an investment to expose the company to the investment community, but everybody howls like banshees when it's evn suggested that Thompson may have paid for something like that (NOTE, I AM NOT suggesting Thompson paid for it). So lets all agree that we hope it's a third party paying for this stuff.
What would be a third parties reason to pay for this exposure? Can we agree it's to create a selling environment? Probably not, but that's the only place I can go, because it's the only thing that MAKES SENSE to me. I can't envision a third party paying to expose KBLB to the investment community without expecting something in return. Not how the investment community works...again, common sense.
The big question then is.....If KBLB's stock price is ready to explode, why would somebody create a selling environment at this time?
Doesn't make sense.
There are plenty of holes in this for anybody to take shots at, and they are big enough to hit. This post is much more steeped in common sense than in rock hard supportable data. Do what you want with it.
