Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[fourkids_9pets]

well i look forward to what you have to share
and who exactly and HOW exactly that *collusion*
came about/happened ~ as well as the *time line*
this all *transpired* ~ of course that is if
it is ever shared in this .. er .. venue

==

I do not prejudge or predict things, it is what it is. That said, two more entities are climbing way up my alleged collusion ladder.

==

no disrespect but without *facts* on the table
known and shown to all .. it's *just* an opinion
and JUDGMENT is clearly indicated by your own words

My private undertaking has clearly identified two entities who are involved in collusion with this company and at least one of it's officers.

that is why i have posted that knowledge of
the *process* in its entirety <which no one posting
here will have 100% access to re: expo holdings> is vital
if one is going to invest in a legit co. on the OTC

let's be very clear here

there are only a handful of folks who know each and every
step of expo coming public and the subsequent actions
undertaken and why those actions were undertaken

it would start with the SHELL .. their prior owners
i can tell you since i have knowledge of the prior shell's TA
<since i interacted with them frequently on another co.>
that expo's current mgmt *MOVING* their TA from the
*inherited* one from the R/M .. was something i considered
a positive since the prior inherited one has a co. policy
of NOT GIVING OUT ANY SS INFO

on a side note .. i was on the phone the other day to a TA IN NV
<for a fully sec compliant co. that trades on the NASDAQ> and their
co. policy is to NOT GIVE OUT SS INFO FOR ANY CO.s .. there
are many reasons given for this .. but it usually comes down
to a liability issue .. i don't agree with it ..
but i also don't control it

that is why for my own risk/reward .. i applauded expo's current
mgmt *MOVING* and PAYING for the OS/AS given out on a per call basis

so since those individuals absolutely aren't posting
<nor imo have they ever> in this venue .. it leaves
the rest of us to do .. yep .. that respective DD
which connects the dots <in some cases more easily
than others> .. i did so back in 2008

since then <2008> there have been numerous changes
as factors are impacted and subsequently aspects *change*
based on real world *realities* .. that i neither ignore nor discount

i can't even remember all of the bits posted that made me go HUH???

whether OS/MM RHUB/TA/FTDs/UNREGISTERED CO./UCCs'/MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
PAYER/GOAL OF THE CELLAR/ABUSIVE SHORTS/WASH TRADING/NC SOS vs.
NV SOS or the most mind boggling belief of all *POSTED* ..
that mgmt pocketed the take of each days' trading on exph

====
RHUB

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=59859972&txt2find=RHUB

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=59860549&txt2find=RHUB

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60028391&txt2find=RHUB

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60028418

ISSUED & OUTSTANDING/RESTRICTED/FLOAT

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=62328463

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=62344371

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=64283318

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=64289108

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=64306628

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=64289919

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=64290967

UCCs

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=63894246

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=63915545

==

curious jerry .. since you've posted about legal counsel
has contact actually been made with a firm or is *initial* DD
still being done 2 years after initial purchase of exph?

==
4kids
all jmo