InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 23
Posts 1883
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/28/2006

Re: None

Friday, 07/15/2011 1:11:58 PM

Friday, July 15, 2011 1:11:58 PM

Post# of 59551
SMF - in beginning my search for info, I came across the series of posts by Woodberry (and one from Kimble)

It seems his conclusion, as is mine, is that there was no misleading ( obfuscation - I love that word !---:o) ) on MN part. No mention of specific consultants, only the generic .

MN is constrined by regulatory rules and by what he is "allowed" to say by his boss.

Here is thread, and unless I missed something, I have no problem with what was said by MN and subsequently posted by Woodberry.

***********************************************************************


Profile Woodberry578 Share Monday, April 25, 2011 3:47:36 PM
Re: None Tweet Post # of 45019
I just heard from Mike Nessen of Imaging3, and he says "our consultants and legal teams are doing just fine." The rumor mill on this board is just that: a rumor mill!!

I choose to believe Mike over anyone posting on this board. IMO.

**************************************************************

Member Profile kimble1 Share Thursday, April 28, 2011 10:45:09 AM
Re: Woodberry578 post# 41438 Tweet Post # of 45019
woodberry....so what does NESSEN have to say today??

seems like he was a little misleading the other day dont you agree??

************************************************************
Woodberry578 Member Profile Woodberry578 Share Thursday, April 28, 2011 11:36:45 AM
Re: kimble1 post# 41542 Tweet Post # of 45019
Not misleading. I was told the attorney/consultant situation is fine. There was never any mention of MWE. I take that to mean our attorney/consultant situation is fine.

************************************************************


Woodberry578 Member Profile Woodberry578 Share Thursday, April 28, 2011 3:14:43 PM
Re: Dr. Mugs post# 41571 Tweet Post # of 45019

Update: after checking my email correspondence with Mike Nessen since the first of the year, I see no specific mention of MWE as our law firm. If I mentioned MWE, then it was an assumption on my part and no fault belongs to Mike Nessen.

Again, if Mike says our consultants / attorneys are doing fine, I trust we are in good hands with whomever is handling it