InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 94
Posts 13971
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/15/2005

Re: 10 bagger post# 33

Thursday, 07/14/2011 12:08:02 PM

Thursday, July 14, 2011 12:08:02 PM

Post# of 80
10bagger, Mike, et al,

Sure could use some clarity as to whether it was forced (i.e. the seller would have gone under otherise), or whether AUTO thought this was a good, accretive fit.

IMO, some of the evidence provided gives the forced scenario a bit higher probablility. AUTO was getting well over 10% in interest on the $9 plus million owed to them by the seller, so they will lose that income, and of course that $9 million asset is lost. In return they get the biz, but at least in the latest period it was stated in the 8k that the seller had a loss. And AUTO (as per the 8k) was getting 25% of pretax income greater than zero from the seller prior to this transaction.

A listing of the value of assets/liabilities acquired would certainly be helpful, especially the a/r and a/p (if those are part of the deal).

One other thing, the deal wont effect the current reporting quarter...and they should put up strong numbers in a little while.

Anyway, good luck.




Amazing Grace:

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.