InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 56
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/12/2005

Re: doodlemike post# 670

Monday, 05/30/2005 5:41:21 PM

Monday, May 30, 2005 5:41:21 PM

Post# of 3354
Doodlemike coming to Talbot's rescue!!! Whats that tell you folks?

Doodle, you come you haven't answered the question about your average cost? In 2 some years, you have not made a profit and yet such unblinding faith towards Talbot? To say that he does not owe us anything shows me you are either very gullible, or a paid tout, or an insider. Many of your claims have not come to pass. First MSITF will be a $1 a share. Then the O/S is not more than 700 million shares. Then the O/S is not more than 1.2 Billion...then the O/S around 1.9 Billion is accurate...and now finally the O/S around 2.1 billion is the more accurate figure. And yet, no call to the transfer agent? Odd. And yet you defend Jettinight? Are you implying that the transfer agent is wrong with the O/S? I can't argue with a fool and if Orangeman wants to do that, thats on him. Then you always make the lovely claim of patience, patience, patience. How much patience? For a pennystock? Are you kidding me? All the other pennystocks you tout you go in for the very very short term and yet MSITF, 'oh investors need patience with this stock?'. What for? So Talbot can screw us even more?

If a lawsuit or SEC complaint brings about financial disclosure, whats wrong with that? Are you not for financial disclosure? Talbot made the choice not to publish it, no one else.


"ivearnedit, I have to touch on a patently naive statement you made: "Enough is enough, I am tired of all these positive PR's and the stock goes down." If you think MSITF can be blamed for the forces of market activity towards the stock, and if that serves as a basis for your complaint against the company, then it is likely to be viewed as frivolous..."

You have the gall to say that ivearnedit made a 'patently naive statement'? Who's the one being naive here? 'The forces of Market activity' is whats to blame? Maybe you didn't get it. Talbot is diluting every single day. That creates a downward pressure on the stock especially if the masses aren't buying. Therefore, this makes Talbot directly responsible for the poor stock performance. You mentioned before that investors have been weary and cautious on this stock. Well why would that be? Especially with all the positive PRs and contracts? 'Well the contract with Aladdin did not come to pass...' So what about the other contracts? How can you be so sure that they have not come to pass? Isn't it quite ironic that you fax a letter to Talbot some months ago addressing shareholder concerns when the stock price reached your average cost? Now why would you do something like that?

'Talbot owes you nothing'. Nonsense, plain and simple. I put money into this stock for an opportunity of a great return. Of course there's risk, but its a measured risk. You see if the company was not making contracts, not selling VSCAN, not doing this or that and the stock price goes down, well yeah, I should lose my investment. But when everything is going oh so well? China and India approval, the worlds 2 biggest markets and not over a penny a share? Only for it to drop back to 1/4 of a penny? All these shipping of kits, great testing results, etc etc. No no, Talbot owes me something and everyshareholder here. Its called SHOW ME THE BOOKS. I want audited financials. What kind of CEO is late for financials 2 years in a row? There's no excuse for that, 'oh its a pinksheet stock'...oh I get it, a license to screw shareholders right? The path of least resistance...What do they say, the emperor has no clothes? Everyone on this board or any board, I hope people can see for what Doodlemike is really like.