InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 61
Posts 3673
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/27/2008

Re: danthomas post# 170208

Wednesday, 07/13/2011 6:22:56 PM

Wednesday, July 13, 2011 6:22:56 PM

Post# of 241042
I highly doubt you will be stoned for posting an opinion as you see it, but the problem is, the opinion doesn't fit the facts of the events you speak of.

For starters, Eric has always commented on the accuracy, or lack of accuracy about listings when distribution groups are involved. Many times distributors or even retailers don't want to share certain informaion about their operations when competition from other distributors or retailers may be involved. It seems Lancaster was pushing hard early on, and may still be doing so today, but the issues you raise are well documented on this board, and are as follows.

Lancaster/Parent company bought out Five Star distribution. The combined companies began a consolidation and re-organization of personnel and distribution warehouses, thus a possible interruption of progress during this time frame. It definately postponed a monthly promotion Lancaster was going to provide for Winning Brands. It certainly doesn't take a blog to inform investors of other companies financial situations, BK filings are public information and were released through press releases from Lancaster itself.

It all boils down to trust, and there are those here who don't trust the CEO, and others who do. It's all a matter of opinion, and opinions shouldn't matter when there are facts available that state the contrary.

Now that the re-structuring is complete with Lancaster maybe we can get the attention once again through promotional offerings. Lancaster can still equate to a couple of NA in time as awareness in the US grows.