InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1511
Posts 35073
Boards Moderated 7
Alias Born 07/12/2004

Re: Renee post# 300

Wednesday, 07/13/2011 9:43:37 AM

Wednesday, July 13, 2011 9:43:37 AM

Post# of 301
CTHS: Revoked by the meany SEC:

http://sec.gov/litigation/admin/2011/34-64866.pdf

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors to accept the Offer of Settlement submitted by Simex Technologies, Inc. (n/k/a CT Holdings, Inc.) (“CT Holdings” or “Respondent”) pursuant to Rule 240(a) of the Rules of Practice of the Commission, 17 C.F.R. § 201.240(a), for the purpose of settlement of these proceedings initiated against Respondent on June 14, 2011, pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”).

II.

Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Making Findings and Revoking Registration of Securities Pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as to Simex Technologies, Inc. (n/k/a CT Holdings, Inc.) (“Order”), as set forth below.

III.

On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds that1:

1. CT Holdings (CIK No. 1089499) is a Delaware corporation located in San Diego, California. At all times relevant to this proceeding, the securities of CT Holdings have been registered under Exchange Act Section 12(g). As of June 2, 2011, the company’s stock (symbol “CTHS”) was quoted on OTC Link (previously, “Pink Sheets”) operated by OTC Markets Group Inc., had nine market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3).
2. CT Holdings has failed to comply with Exchange Act Section 13(a) and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder because it has not filed any periodic reports with the Commission since the period ended September 30, 2008.

IV.

In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors to impose the sanction specified in Respondent’s Offer.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not binding on any other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.

Pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(j), registration of each class of Respondent’s securities registered pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12 be, and hereby is, revoked.
For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Elizabeth M. Murphy
Secretary

To bite the worm of incite is to bite the HOOK of the antagonist . They win .

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.