Greenshift Corporation (GERS)

[vineyardstock]

The venue GERS finds itself in is do to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, which in this case was initiated by the judicial panel and not Greenshift. Greenshift initiated sep. litigation in differing venues which were then consolited by the panel. In order for a a Tex venue or Wis, or Calif Greenshift would of had to directly initiate that action, whereas in this instanct they files sporatically. At least that is my understanding under 28 U.S.C. § 1407. The reasoning of the judicial panel for the current venue is that; it was a secondary choice initially as well as it's locale to the ethanol producers involved.

Just some quick DD