Here you go, I remember making a note of Skibumbz statements after the AGM. Your question just jogged my memory.
Unfortunately, this just raises more questions as to what is happening with the 30 ton processors?
Since this was slipped to a shareholder, if true, I also think it should have been announced already via their web page, to be fair to all current shareholders - this info seems material.
GLTY
skibumbz Share Sunday, June 12, 2011 3:20:46 PM
Re: fourkids_9pets post# 112487 Post # of 118767
Hey to all, great AGM, had a nice conversation with V.P. Bob Molodynia afterwards and he slipped in telling me some great info that will be PR'd soon with respect to the 20 ton processor. :-0
skibumbz Share Sunday, June 12, 2011 3:45:00 PM
Re: Sexual Healing post# 112498 Post # of 118767
LMAO! All I will say is... that the 20 ton will be the standard from here on out and with a few adjustments... John has been able to... well the results will blow you away!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm having one of those deja vu moments...
some time back, in a post or in a company statement, it was stated...
that going forward processors would be 20T, not 30T.
(Anyone remember this... or want to claim it as the source?)
At the time, I thought that a bit unusual after the time spent to develop the 30T unit. However, since I am in no position to opine on it, I just filed it away in a vague recess of my memory!
This possible retreat from 30T processors might have been because of some loss of efficiency scaling up to 30T from 20T... bringing us back to GWMAN's analysis:
investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=65065775
In addition to being very interesting to think about, these issues needing to be resolved ACCOUNT for some of the DELAY TIME that is being perceived since the AGM! IMHO
