InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1183
Posts 134793
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 08/27/2003

Re: A deleted message

Saturday, 07/09/2011 4:46:45 PM

Saturday, July 09, 2011 4:46:45 PM

Post# of 312016
Nah. Since most MRFs are forced to send waste plastic to landfill at an expense yet still the MRFs tend to break-even or are profitable, JBII's MRF should have a negative expense in that it can avoid tipping fees by processing the plastic.

Since other MRFs pay on average $100/ton in tipping fees alone and still say break-even in the Niagara Falls region, JBII's MRF will have save $100/ton that its competitors will not. This is not a cost to produce -- this is a negative cost that is normally unavailable to MRFs.

Besides, why don't you ask Justice how many employees work at the MRF. Then you'll see that you have to make up costs, literally. If you think there's some huge expensive team there -- you're dead wrong.

Some have tried to claim all sorts of aspects of the P2O process are "expensive" -- but nobody has been able to say exactly what these fictional expenses come from. They have 11 P2O employees. They have free plastic. They have tiny amounts of energy costs. I know, I know -- "plastic is expensive to process" -- expensive how? They have to put money in a donation bin? Because the staff is very cheap. The energy is cheap. The plastic is free. Every aspect in reality is dirt cheap. You have to make up costs. Literally.

Raw

Research & analysis on some of my favorite stocks is located on the sticky note on the SwingTrade board.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=1781