Yep, I am fine with it. For if this company survives these current events, it's going to bounce back. I am not in this for a flip, so if it becomes properly valued while I am froze out great. I'll toss in a limit order to pick up some more shares if it ever unfreezes. Pretty sure that number is still south of current pricing. Keep in mind new information may come to light and it could shoot up! If the stuff EY is calling for pans out, hell, it won't much matter if I buy in at .01 or .05... Okay, that's bogus, even you all won't fall for this statement.
Right now, all I am saying is I hope this stock gets unlocked first of all. Second, I would love to see my current holdings are at my pps entry point. Third, but if it is not, I may buy assuming the price reaches a point I am comfortable re-entering at. Which is lower than the point I originally bought at before I became intimately knowldegable with the kind of exterme optimism spewed forth on this site. I mean when folks who weigh the good and the bad get lambasted as Chicken Littles, I question the credibility of them more so than the naysayers. This coming from me, a glass half full kind of a guy.
I do dislike the lock, but not because I think the MM's are ripping us off. No I dislike for very real reasons, that for it to be locked out an entire week means something very real is going on behind the investigative scene. Yep, it all may turn out that Tom and Fuentes are the only dirty or maybe just extremely foolish members of the SFIO clan. However, I think the reason I am fine with the lock is I would rather they hash it all out to limit the damage some of the day traders can do. You know, the ones that prey on gullible investors. They do exist, and they are the reason this stock is locked, not because E-Trade or Scottrade need to cover a couple million in losses, that's peanuts to them.
