InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 4220
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/10/2003

Re: stakddek post# 26731

Friday, 05/27/2005 2:42:58 PM

Friday, May 27, 2005 2:42:58 PM

Post# of 82595
Stakddek, Feel free to use innocent bystanders as a foil to avoid responding directly to me. Luckily Miss Scarlet is capable of withstanding such nonsense with a weary smile.

I feel Frog is being shortsighted when he states the only purpose is "more dillution."

Frog said no such thing.

The company said they needed the extra shares to sustain their ongoing efforts. The company said the net effect would be dilutive.

Isn't it funny that when 'frog' repeats what the company says, it suddenly becomes sinsiter and dark.

You people are amazing. bag8ger talks about the imaginary differences between DNAP company and DNAP pps. I am slowly beginning to appreciate his characterization.

When he talks about DNAP 'pps' he really means DNAP 'reality'. When he discusses DNAP 'company' he really means the idyllic dream company that doesn't really exist, but resides in the back of his mind.

The evidence for this disconnect is that whenever DNAP lies to the investors, the lies are ignored because they don't correlate with the dream. Alternately, whenever DNAP tells the truth and it still doesn't correlate, that also is ignored. Not only ignored but when repeated by a poster, that poster is condemned for being negative.

regards,
frog