Bliss--I have to disagree. I see a distinct different between ewave interpretations and Hurst the way it is practiced here--and especially concerning the larger cycles which are generally easier to interpret.
There are certain valid trendlines--especially when anticipating 80-week and 4-year lows--which when crossed could be used reliably by a large percentage of the population to withdrawn funds from the market.
I believe this method could be verified scientifically and adopted by a significant percentage of the population. I understand that to date the market has operated by keeping the majority confused most of the time. I think that could change in this era of systems analysis and mass communication.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.