InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252525
Next 10
Followers 831
Posts 119993
Boards Moderated 17
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: genisi post# 113883

Sunday, 06/26/2011 2:20:07 PM

Sunday, June 26, 2011 2:20:07 PM

Post# of 252525
SNY details Lyxumia-vs-Byetta data from GetGoal-X:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Positive-Results-for-prnews-511265329.html?x=0&.v=1


• Lixisenatide once daily achieved its primary endpoint of non-inferiority in A1C reduction versus exenatide twice daily (LS mean +/- SE change from baseline: -0.79 +/- 0.05 vs. -0.96 +/- 0.05).

Discontinuations due to adverse events (mainly gastrointestinal events including nausea, diarrhea and vomiting) were 33 (10.4%) in the lixisenatide group and 41 (13.0%) in the exenatide group.

Significantly fewer patients experienced symptomatic hypoglycemia with lixisenatide (2.5% vs. 7.9%, p<0.05), with 6-fold fewer hypoglycemic events (8 vs. 48) versus exenatide.

So far, so good; however, I don’t understand this:


• Mean body weight significantly decreased from baseline in the lixisenatide group compared to the exenatide group (94.5 to 91.7 kg with lixisenatide vs. 96.7 to 92.9 kg with exenatide).

How can that be right?

The success of GetGoal-X on the primary endpoint was reported in Feb 2011 (#msg-59446260), but this weekend was the first time the data were presented.

See the prologue of #msg-63710626 for more info on the Lyxumia phase-3 program.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.