Well that is an interesting viewpoint that deserves some consideration.
So the strategy of the company might revolve around which side of the coin is most beneficial. If there are more investors wanting out then it is clearly in the company's best interest to keep the lock in place. Additionally if the number of shares in play can be restricted, then even silly nonsense PRs might cause enough action to bump up the pps briefly. On the other hand lifting the lock doesn't appear to offer much to the company. The bid doesn't ever last long even in a restricted market, if it was completely open there wouldn't be any bid lasting more than a few seconds.
Given the choices it seems obvious that RCCH has no real interest in having the lock lifted, in fact they are getting more advantage from the lock than they would get without it.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.