InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 37856
Next 10
Followers 42
Posts 3685
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 01/16/2009

Re: fink post# 9342

Friday, 06/24/2011 2:09:43 AM

Friday, June 24, 2011 2:09:43 AM

Post# of 37856
I can't begin to address all your concerns but I am confident that IR will address them to the extent possible. What I will say is that with people like JC I tend to tune out the noise and focus on the fundamentals of the company. I tend not to believe even written docs from certain sources; I am thinking of the bogus Series A preferreds. With permission from the courts the pseudo-ceo now has the ability to dilute but those series A's remain unconverted for some reason, don't they. I don't know what docs you have seen that I have not so I won't comment.

I would advise you to look at the path of corporate destruction in his wake and to review both pacer and the SEC site. The modus operandi is to sue anyone in your path until they run out of resources to fight you - there is no firm definition of "truth" or "right" there is only making a toxic deal and then litigating the company into submission. These companies generally have huge debt, most of it toxic and that makes this very lucrative for people who don't mind making a living this way. This company does not fit the mold so I am not so worried about any ability to take it down that path - it already has sustainable revenue and several new, viable revenue streams being launched as I type this.

IN the case of NHSH I am invested because I see a company with no debt, an attractive share structure even if no changes are made and no matter who currently owns those shares and revenue. Not only revenue but obviously the company is run frugally based on the percentage of revenue that drops directly to their bottom line. Unlike QASP and the other scammy stocks - there are no huge salaries, corporate jet trips and huge payments to non-existent merger candidates. They have an attractive number of viable products but I would buy this stock based on the broadband sales alone because of the huge profit margins in that sector and because of their unique approach to that market. Mineseeker has great potential under the direction of Edward Cross but I would buy this stock without them.

I will tune out the noise of the nay-sayers and pumpers and be very confident in this stock's future performance. Depending on your investment style, there are a couple of bucks that may come to you sooner with some scammy stock but this one will outperform in the long haul in my opinion. I equate this stock to ZAGG which i bought at .29 and held during the times when the bears said they would never sell their product, they had doubtful financing, dilution - etc,the usual talking points. That stock was recently $13.00. Do I call $13.00 on this one - no, but I didn't on that one either! Anyway, I wish you much success in whatever you choose to do with your investment dollars. I will be here confidently for awhile as I see much more upside than down to this stock and I don't think even JC will have any negative impact once the market really sees this one for what it is. Look at the products and the potential and the frugality, creativity and focus of the management team - that's what it's really about.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.