Digital Locations Inc (DLOC)

[Ecomike]

Byron was legally obligated to disclose that November news that their attorneys had discovered prior art that made the November catalyst un-patentable, or risk getting nailed by the SEC and stockholder lawsuits for withholding it. It was the kind of information they could be sued for not immediately disclosing.

The other grey (not good news, possibly bad news) news (what I was referring to when I said bad news that he is not giving full disclosure on), he continues to sit on is what I am referring to.

Another poster said I was wrong about 2000 hours of catalyst tests already being done. He is wrong, I am right. CABN already completed, and announced 2000 hours of lab testing of the catalyst was completed, lab testing meaning to any chemist or chemical engineer, that they ran the test with high purity CO2 and CH4 feeds. The current 1000 hours of additional complete testing is with the commercial, dirtier, less pure feeds like a commercial facility will need and want to use. It is too costly to totally purify the CO2 and CH-4 feed stock before feeding it to the reactor. The trick is to find a catalyst that is not quickly poisoned by those contaminates. Those contaminates will vary by compound and concentration from well to well, which further complicates commercialization!

There are catalysts that will already do dry reforming, but none of them have been economical yet. They had various problems, like poisoning from commercial contaminates that deactivated the catalyst.