Really, wow, that's news to me. Questions being raised equates to doing something improper? Not necessarily. Have to wait to find out what exactly those questions were, then whether or not Laidlaw accepts responsibility here. If Laidlaw denies some of the more serious SEC concerns, we might never find out if Laidlaw did something improper. Unless, of course, the SEC decides to take the legal route in regards to the more serious concerns, at which that point, a Judge will decide whether or not Laidlaw did something improper.
The speeding ticket example, in the words of one of our grey market experts here, that's comparing apples to oranges.
Finally, by stating this is caused by the Laidlaw, you could be misleading people here.
