InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 252
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/26/2006

Re: Santa Barbara Broker post# 97192

Saturday, 06/18/2011 5:25:18 PM

Saturday, June 18, 2011 5:25:18 PM

Post# of 103340
Any shorts that were on the stock at .03 cents are 1) more likely insiders who dumped their shares on the way up and knew exactly what was going on and 2) LONG gone...and I mean LONG GONE.

-----


Just because they're is a big volume of shares trading from .03 down to .0003 doesn't mean shorters can cover. More than likely more counterfeit shares driving this down to lowest levels possible and hopefully a small company like this will go bankrupt or get delisted. Then, they don't have to cover at all. Do they? And try to be honest.