InvestorsHub Logo

FTW

Followers 7
Posts 1739
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/17/2009

FTW

Re: eminem post# 109339

Friday, 06/17/2011 12:00:18 PM

Friday, June 17, 2011 12:00:18 PM

Post# of 111729
A promoter who never once has admitted the constant failures and shortcomings of BEHL wrote:

At this point we can safely assume that the company is at least being responsible for the assets we know for sure we do have, and have had for several months now. We can't say that about our past BOD, can we?



Why would anyone assume that, let alone 'safely assume'? There is not one reason to assume that. There are several reasons to not assume that.

One being that:
The past BOD increased the # of Authorized Shares by 4 billion shares over a year period.
The current BOD/fake CEO/Pawson&DF/Fraud combo increased the # of Authorized Shares by 10 billion shares, 2 months after *supposedly* taking over.

That screams responsible company.