![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Friday, June 17, 2011 12:00:18 PM
At this point we can safely assume that the company is at least being responsible for the assets we know for sure we do have, and have had for several months now. We can't say that about our past BOD, can we?
Why would anyone assume that, let alone 'safely assume'? There is not one reason to assume that. There are several reasons to not assume that.
One being that:
The past BOD increased the # of Authorized Shares by 4 billion shares over a year period.
The current BOD/fake CEO/Pawson&DF/Fraud combo increased the # of Authorized Shares by 10 billion shares, 2 months after *supposedly* taking over.
That screams responsible company.
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM