InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 574
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/05/2010

Re: BRIG_88 post# 114326

Friday, 06/17/2011 9:06:11 AM

Friday, June 17, 2011 9:06:11 AM

Post# of 312016

I prefer to stick with the current limits set by DEC than blindly trust John who has made many mistakes in the past regarding how easy it is to get permits with the DEC. Iregardless of all the past mistakes and missed estimates he has a lot to be proud of.

He can submit all the one page letters he wants, the DEC owes him nothing, and there are requirements still to be met in the next 60 or 180 days regarding the testing of the machines at 2,000lbs per hour.

It's quite possible and one can reasonably expect that those tests will be passed with flying colors - but until then I'll run my numbers with the current numbers set by the DEC - beacuse right now that's the only facts we have.



Incorrect. The reason limits were set is DEC had no metric to go by on JBII....it's a brand new disruptive technology they have never seen,never dealt with and had no regulations to deal with it.....we're not talking an incinerator here....once again i state: I asked the CEO after the AGM about increased throughput and feed stock changes to their current permit with DEC. His reply: DEC has worked closely with us and any changes can be submitted to DEC with a one page letter. He foresaw NO problems being granted the changes......why this seems to be an issue i don't know.....how many times to do i have to post this information?.....perhaps one of the mods should put this info in a sticky note?...