InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 212
Posts 22564
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 05/19/2010

Re: jmhgolf post# 14340

Thursday, 06/16/2011 11:45:52 PM

Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:45:52 PM

Post# of 22918
well it has already gone from "0" (according to board talk) to "counting them on one hand" (in one "professional's" eyes). Obviously grey to pink has happened & this isn't just a possibility of a "first." Truly, has anyone, in their history, ever witnessed this magnitude of bulk suspensions, in one shot, by this identical (or similar type) task force to be able to predict the future of these companies? I'm not talking about individual halts demoting to grey. Many still question: how do you outweigh what is called "potential fraud" from the specifics that the sec broadly gave to each of these 17 stocks? Am I being too logical when I state: "If these were all associated with fraud, then the sec would have clustered them up with no individual explanation(s)." Less than 18% on this list seem to have transparency issues only (including anwm).