80% of the blog you are referring to was about the ACT trials, 10% about Geron and 10% about the ethical dilemma which in the case of our trials using MA09 apllies, right? So why on earth bring up the fact in a trial update article like that about the non destruction process? To me, it is akin to throwing gas on a fire. If ACT doesn't lead on the issue why should some reporter with limited knowledge try and explain?..
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.