InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 1730
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/12/2007

Re: oc631 post# 123

Tuesday, 06/14/2011 3:21:52 PM

Tuesday, June 14, 2011 3:21:52 PM

Post# of 177

Would Pharmasset consider signing a GT2/GT3 agreement for PSI-7977/SOC (exclusive of other genotypes) if early approval is in fact attainable?

I doubt it considering they want an experienced/well funded partner moving 7977/SOC into Phase 3 with the other genotypes. The possibility of an early filing increases the value of their asset substantially along with their leverage in doing a deal.











The situation with VRUS has changed since I started this thread and with it some ideas I have about how they will move forward. The big news from VRUS is them adding a PSI-7977 monotherapy arm in their phase 2b study. PSI-7977 monotherapy would move much more quickly through late stage testing than the dual nuke combination. PSI-938 hasn't had the chance to prove itself in phase 2 the way 7977 has so more extensive late stage testing can be expected with this combo.

So how else has the story changed?

My idea that VRUS wouldn't seek a partner exclusively for the rollout of PSI-7977/SOC* in GT2/GT3 patients no longer holds water for the simple fact that we may never see PSI-7977/SOC late stage testing in all genotypes. Late stage testing of PSI-7977 very well may be all oral consisting of PSI-7977 monotherapy and the PSI-7977/938 combo. PSI-7977 testing in combination with SOC in GT2/GT3 could also end at phase 2 if the FDA is open minded and allows an early NDA filing.


*It should be noted that the standard of care (SOC) which I refer to here is Pegylated interferon/Ribavirin when if fact the current SOC in HCV treatment is Peg/Riba in combination with a protease inhibitor.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.