InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 28
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/07/2011

Re: BigOnChina post# 32659

Tuesday, 06/14/2011 10:09:56 AM

Tuesday, June 14, 2011 10:09:56 AM

Post# of 34471
I'm going to agree with you there. While I was excited to finally see any sort of update, I am less than excited by the language presented in the filing.

Basically, it sounds like they are trying to get the case dismissed by saying the claims are unfounded. In other words, there is no evidence for the claims made by Starr, and thus MW and Citron. Nowhere do I see them deny that any of the claims are true. I'd love to get Andrew and Koufax's opinion as our resident lawyers to see if this kind of language is normal in order to protect the clients or the to protect the defense's strateguy for the upcoming case. I think I have a reason to be concerned with the way it is written but I like an expert opinion.

I'd love if they denied that any of the claims are true, but I just don't see it. With that said, I would expect to see a small bump in the price from the news that they are fighting it, one way or another.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.