InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,618.26
(
-0.29%
)
US TECH 100
19,177.60
(
1.70%
)
Dow Jones
41,503.10
(
-0.25%
)
Brent Oil
74.07
(
2.33%
)
Bitcoin
62,197.46
(
0.85%
)
Post# of 129054
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

DouglasJH

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 857
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/28/2009

DouglasJH

Re: newmedman post# 25566

Thursday, 06/09/2011 9:49:25 PM

Thursday, June 09, 2011 9:49:25 PM

Post# of 129054
Thanks for the post.

Oregon story
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v11/n377/a03.html?1042

You should contact this Fellow
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v11/n377/a02.html?1042



Well I disagree with the first story. Many have forgotten that the US Supreme Court has already ruled that the "United States Attorney General could not enforce the federal Controlled Substances Act against physicians who prescribed drugs, in compliance with Oregon state law" See Wikipedia:Gonzales vs Oregon This protection must extend to patients as well.

On the second story, I have already picked up petitions from Paul Stanford and have begun to circulate them.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up