Followers | 37 |
Posts | 2134 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 12/20/2010 |
![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Thursday, June 09, 2011 3:47:33 PM
Hardwood, I completely agree with you in the sense that a trading halt is too difficult for most companies to recover from.
The SEC should have other ways of protecting the public without making it so incredibly difficult for the halted company to return.
With that said, if the company was intentionally falsifying information, then their assets should be redistributed back to shareholders, and the principles should forfeit all of their posessions as they have defrauded individuals.
The SEC feels the need to shut down a company like this, but yet they allow Washington Mutual bank stock to trade for years after the company went bankrupt and was purchased in whole by another company.
This "protection" is not protection it's enforcement. And a lot of perfectly good people get damaged since there it is virtually impossible for a company to recover from a Halt.
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM
Kona Gold Beverages Reaches Out to Largest Debt Holder for Debt Purchase Negotiation • KGKG • Jul 17, 2024 9:00 AM
Avant Technologies Welcomes Back Former CEO with Eye Toward Future Growth and Expansion • AVAI • Jul 17, 2024 8:00 AM