Lowman, can I get your opinion on this?
I am new here and have lurked for a few weeks now.At this point, I have enjoyed your objectivity.
Can you give me your opinion on the question I asked last night. I was trying to lead away from the whole brothers scandal thing and thought I asked a very reasonable question. Someone did post a report that I will read but I would like your opinion.
This was my original question:
["Here is my main question. What are the revenue #'s from the european markets?
If it is in fact in 80% of vending machines and in stores, they should be netting good profits from this since 2009/2010??"}
"thanks for the reply
Maybe I am a being bit naive here but why wouldn't good sales figures and revenues make sense to be made public? Would that not generate confidence in the company that they know how to make a profit? (Even if that is not their entire endgame, that being the US market) "
"Synaesthesia, I understand your question.
Revenue generated from the "smoker's option" product has not been made public nor should it be made public. It wouldn't make sense... if you Read the PRs from the last 2 years, the entire focus has been first and foremost to launch the re/al inside the US market. The earned revenue then, should be a reflection of the company's purpose - which is happening now."
"Here is my main question. What are the revenue #'s from the european markets?
If it is in fact in 80% of vending machines and in stores, they should be netting good profits from this since 2009/2010??
"They have distribution contracts with European and Australian sources. And we know since 2009 management has been aggressively preparing to launch the RE/AL inside the US Market. This has been the main focus of the company and is just moments away from happening.
The CEO projects in the 1st year SFIO will reach a minimum of $50M in revenue just inside the US market. "
ca
