InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 20
Posts 3160
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/22/2006

Re: Pro-Truck 14 post# 57650

Monday, 06/06/2011 11:53:57 PM

Monday, June 06, 2011 11:53:57 PM

Post# of 83081
History is history but I have missed nothing concerning the Pampana Area.

It was after all the sole purpose for starting Operations in the country in the first place and so much more.

As to how the company handled the affair the stock price and dilution ever since attests to those decisions.

The market tends to have disagreed with you.

They should have handled the problem far more professionally and upfront with their investors instead of hanging them out to dry.

I really don't want to get back into it so don't draw me back there again or we will all be sorry for it.


Your notes are somewhat askew and could be easily disputed but whats the point. I can see why you made your claim.

I have other things to do and it won't help the stock anyway.

The Pampana Area is rich with resources and has already proven it can be mined cheaply and effectively so going there again would have to be at least a positive development.

Dilution has run rampant since leaving the area and Operating costs have escalated.

Mechanization has clearly not got the job done and this has clearly not been the year we have be waiting for as advertised and again has fallen short.

The problems didn't end when they left the Pampana and of that I am painfully aware of.

At least they have made some progress.

Im sure there are lots both good and bad to rehash for months to come as the rainy season is already upon us.

I do respect that you post your opinion though, good or bad right or wrong it is your right and you should not be intimidated from sharing it.

eye