I think you missed the point entirely.
Please watch the video on the provided link.
That is the point the post is precisely making,
as that poster is suggesting, the move by Mr. Shenher to
STEP AWAY FROM MONTANA, given the statewide devastation,
mainly on the crops they were looking after and the reason they
were THERE, changing direction now to invest to expand their own
plant and in their own technology in Canada,
was indeed a very good move.
So, letting that Montana Deal go, an diverting that investment
to Canada, it was a smart adjustment. CPOW position allows it
to make that kind of adaptations in order too look for the
best direction for the company, which benefits long investors.
It just happens some people can't see beyond the surface and
are always focused on the apparent "negative" spots because
they have their reasons to do that.
In the middle of all this changes on this complex initial
development for CPOW, some could understand that to set
the right direction for CPOW takes precedence over keep
publishing PR's. Once other key steps are taken as CPOW
advances, we will continue to get informed, as we did
with that one.
Conclusion: Some of us interpret that change in direction
as POSITIVE, while everybody is entitled to their own
interpretation of the events.
