DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

gunnabe,

I don't know if he posts HERE.

He does post on RB under several different aliases.

Including 'money_looser', 'sanaad', and 'stockpimpdaddy'.

The evidence has been presented several times, it is fairly comprehensive.

You demand proof. Isn't it funny how "Proof" is required for any claims that run counter to the your worldview, but nothing is required to support a claim that coincides with it?

Given the nature of anonymous aliases and the illegal nature of the participation, the evidence will NEVER stand up in, say, a court of law. However, for the discerning individual the case is more than adequate to provide a high level of confidence. More than enough to realize the complicity of the individual and to be wary of his intentions.

regards,
frog