"I am told that we should post re the stock, and not about people."
But the stock IS the people! Or at least the company is. Plus a few fake "products" starting waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay back with amazing things like magical edible cotton seeds -- or even before that with superduper palace security devices or something -- and then it took off and grew like anything, OVERNIGHT!!! with elf and its cousin vaamp -- always with the help of the PEOPLE, peeps like vlado and tommyboy and his best pal nigel who morphed into the present group of cheerleaders which akshally seems to be made up of only one now, pennsylvania six five oh oh oh.
So what's the prollem with talking about the "people" who made this such a wunnerful share to hold? I mean, they're the ones responsible for getting the good word out, aren't they? They deserve all the credit due them, along with their hypester pals on here and that other site/board which shalL remain unnamed (wouldn't want to offend IHUB sensibilities).
Maybe we shouldn't talk about Ann Jacklin or M. Pouligny. They're people, too, so I guess we should juat ignore them, as well as that Jim fellow at Mott. But they had an interest in the company and/or its hot products. So should we just pretend they and what they said never existed? How about Dr. Zovko? Remember him?
Very confusing board, this. Hard to know quite what to make of it or what sense there is to its rules, I'd say (and just did).
Go cdex!
AI
