InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 441
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/26/2001

Re: None

Thursday, 06/02/2011 10:45:47 AM

Thursday, June 02, 2011 10:45:47 AM

Post# of 93822
Objective thoughts from a thoughtful poster on another board...

"...Eeveryone (even judges) tends to look for ways to cut corners or streamline their workload. Consider the discovery decision that is also still pending. Unless or until the case moves forward, I doubt there will be a ruling on that one.

I just had a thought as to another way to look at this... If the first two claims WERE dispositive (favorable to the defendants), one would think that the judge would want to get that ruling out ASAP so that the case might be cleared from the docket that much quicker. My only fear is that the judge hasn’t even begun to review our case yet, although the longer it goes, the less likely that is.

I consider averages for ‘complex’ cases to be meaningless since we really have no way of knowing whether our case would merit that designation. I can think of many things that would be much more complex than whether or not there is another memory system in the device for example. I think we’re well into the realm of "any day now" for the ruling.

Plus we can reasonably expect the 10K in the next couple weeks. That should show the TEAC settlement. Hopefully we also hear a lot more regarding new technology/business and the Innovations Group soon.



Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.