InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 1404
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/07/2007

Re: carrot_on_stick post# 135753

Wednesday, 06/01/2011 8:32:19 PM

Wednesday, June 01, 2011 8:32:19 PM

Post# of 159752
The stock filings were current as was the TA. That was verified by the SEC when they cleared BCIT to trade in which it did.

The DTCC claimed their was no TA as justification to block trading. That fact still remains proven by the SEC that BCIT had a TA. The DTCC needed reasoning to refuse to clear this stock to hide what was already cleared before. A simple phone call could have cleared that up if financial ruin and corruption exposed directed at those short wouldn't have been the case.

You can twist and spin this all you want, but it was the SEC that cleared BCIT to trade as it did to .15 before fear halted it. Why halt the stock? If there was no TA to clear shares then everything trading would have been fraudulent like it already was.

How exactly did it manage to trade down to .05 when there was no alledged TA or valid physical shares as stated by Thomas Megas the CEO of this company? Are all transaction conducted in our markets conducted out of thin air?

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.