Washington Mutual Preferred fka WAMPQ

[talkoption]

Does the board fear my question regarding the PROSPECTUS?

I have asked for confirmation regarding the dismissal of the prospectus. The terms of fundamental change dictate if the stock is below $17 the value is not worth the investment.

NOBODY has shown me any evidence that the prospectus (contract) is not binding in the conversion features pending.

Is it possible that this is being dodged and avoided because they HOPE it is fair and equitable and disregard the contract language which governs the exchange?

Why is the entire board so DAFT regarding the legal language of the prospectus and lure newbies into this investment with generalized answers?

Does anybody DARE provide a discussion with support and not the feedback Lawrence provide which was mere puff in the air answer.

Any real thinkers with logical answers able to defend or explain this conflict with the governing document of this investment?