YO BRUCE GREAT POST AS USUAL...
My only affirmation of the suggested "Friend of the court idea" is in this revealing LIGHT.
We do not know if here will be any factual evidence presented to the court about the past two years of daily conversation of the passing around of FACTS and Misuse of Ihub by certain company officials.. SHOULD THE COURT be presented, by the plantiff, or the defendants, ANY Ihub notes, messages and other items deemed important to the case, then there could be a necessity for "friend of the court"
Ihub is a big part of commonshareholders and others daily life!
some are very experienced in this life......2+2 does usually = 4
AGAIN, El Bruce i really value your knowledge that is presented here on tha HUB and thank you...