I only own a little of the stock and it doesn't influence my rational and logical approach to these circumstances. The fact is there is no conclusive proof at this time, and for the NY Times to say that fraud has been demonstrated clearly lacks journalistic integrity.
The fact is that pointing to a lack of PR is just the sort of non-evidence that shorts have been using. It may have convinced you and others, it does add to weight to accusations, but it certainly doesn't conclusively prove anything other than what Michael has suggested about mgmt being totally shit by not supporting those that had trusted them.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.