Saturday, May 21, 2011 5:04:43 PM
Overall I agree with your assumptions, but with funds being allocated to two different license #, then KATX is telling the NL government that they had these expenditures on the surrounding area. Several choices for this:
1. some of the original work was outside the 011745M block, thus put on the 17308M block'
2. they are double dipping with expenditures on one block and claiming on the other;
3. some phase II work has been done to the tune of $80K.
However, no matter how you slice it, the $80K cannot include drilling, unless they used a hand auger and a LOT of labour! Or maybe the drill crew donated their time??? ;)
Agree with you 1000% on the side show bickering.... too tiring to even comment on...
Recent KATX News
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 06/20/2024 11:58:38 AM
Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. Provide Positive Developments on Marijuana Breathalyzer Testing • BLO • Jul 11, 2024 8:21 AM
ECGI Holdings Enhances Board with Artificial Intelligence (AI) Expert Ahead of Allon Apparel Launch • ECGI • Jul 10, 2024 8:30 AM
Avant Technologies to Meet Unmet Needs in AI Industry While Addressing Sustainability Concerns • AVAI • Jul 10, 2024 8:00 AM
Panther Minerals Inc. Launches Investor Connect AI Chatbot for Enhanced Investor Engagement and Lead Generation • PURR • Jul 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM