Asyst Technologies, Inc. (fka ASYTQ)

[stevebrooks]

So because they brought the attorney in from tx means they may be having trouble with something? Or is this positive? Why couldn't the same people handle going forward? What problems do you see with the merger if any? Would the HP claim still cause problems? Is that still there? Would it be the key bank release or was that issue solved?

Also why does crossing show so much income or the same amount as asyst did before the BK protection. What seems fishy is that crossing bought the least amount from Asyst? The other two companies that purchased larger amounts of the old asyst co should be receiving income from prior asyst clients as well and crossing should not show all prior income amount...no? Something seems weird unless what crossing purchased allowed them to reap better benefits with what they are doing as a buisness? ??? I am trying to figure out?

Can anyone answer this? Edurk?