There is one thing about you Agribusiness, you are into the details. But, that is a good thing in my opinion.
I hope Mr. Boyd of IBA is monitoring these conversations as well as Mr. Shenher. Even though I believe the structure and strategy of this company are great. The right implementation of their ability to get information out to the general public is lacking. IMO! This gives the Market Makers an unfair advantage to bring this stocks pps down. THAT IS THE NAME OF THEIR GAME. (NITE)
1. You should expect them to give a biased but truthful statements
on CPOW. After all that is what they are hired to do.
2. The long days average is .12, you tell me why it is not there.
The full pps, long term needs/should be brought forward with full explaination. Example: Prospectus.
3. I thought there was a 45 days from year end or quarter to file?
I could be wrong on that. An audited report would be advantageous in respect to PR, credibility.
4. There might be some type of database. Not sure how they would get it. Maybe by auditing each broker for that info. In my past experience this info is supplied by a PROSPECTUS, once again.
A prospectus can be updated/published as often as needed, usually quarterly or annually. (Note: Usually audited.)
5. As I have stated before, Montana is in the heart of camelina country but it does have a railway heading and access to a pipeline that pushes oil. Great Plains will and can take all camelina production. IMO, this company is key for this plant.
Thus, the reason for the particular agreement they established.
For the rest of you, you might reread my post of April 16, #3491.
I tried to think logically how all these plants tied together and all the contacts that had been made to that point. Plus, I went further and looked at those contacts, contacts.
There is a much, much bigger picture here than just this company.
But, because of that bigger picture, this company fits right into it and has huge growth potential even without the CGG/JV.
Sometimes we can't see the forest for the trees.
