InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 23
Posts 4070
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/03/2007

Re: None

Wednesday, 05/18/2011 10:43:38 AM

Wednesday, May 18, 2011 10:43:38 AM

Post# of 103340

with an OS essentially maxed out to the AS i doubt many believe there won't be a r/s in EXPO's future


What we have here, is an apparent failure to communicate between Expo management and all shareholders of their stock. The ISSUE is not what shareholders BELIEVE about Expo Holding's management's intent to perform a reverse split. They have always clearly intended to do one. The ISSUE here is...has Expo Holding's management LIED about their intent to do a reverse split? They would have appeared to have lied THREE TIMES about their intent to perform a reverse split:

1) They would have appeared to have lied when they filed the reverse split on the NV SOS site in February 2011 and claimed it was a simple "error".

2) They would have appeared to have lied AGAIN when they implied to shareholders that the "error" on the form was "impossible to correct".

3) And they would have appeared to have lied a THIRD time when they recently stated that a reverse split was not a consideration POST filing for one on the NV SOS site in February 2011.

I won't even include the numerous misleading information released starting back in March 2010 about how a reverse split was never going to even be considered. It's been stated in the complete absense of factual documentation and against any and all clear logic available that current management has no input into any decision making whatsoever concerning the company. This despite holding positions as BOD member, CEO of the corporation and Chairman of the Board. Still, when the reverse split was filed, SOMEONE had to direct SOMEONE to do so. SOMEONE would appear to have known at the time that the company intended to do a reverse split (as has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt by a shareholder's diligence in presenting the correction form to Expo management not ONCE but TWICE and their current failure to do a single thing about it). So, whether Harrs or Brown or the "mystery man" hiding behind the curtain running the whole operation with "different intent" ordered the reverse split to be filed, BROWN AND HARRS KNEW. One or BOTH signed off on it. THEY would have appeared to have lied repreatedly about it. And that FACT can no longer be kicked down the road or rolled into pretzel logic trying to excuse it. THEY SEEMINGLY LIED TO SHAREHOLDERS. PERIOD. And if it is proven they purposefully lied about that, then they will likely lie in any supposed revelation of "transparency". They will likely lie about current business contracts. They will likely lie about EVERYTHING. So absolutely NOTHING anyone is "waiting on" may ever prove to be anything but more apparent lies and therefore will be useless in doing anything besides intitiating still one more pump and dump of shares for PIPE funders and PPs for insiders. All IMHO.

NOTE: **edited for content**