InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 435
Posts 57599
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 01/09/2007

Re: Jeremiah post# 95210

Tuesday, 05/17/2011 9:13:46 PM

Tuesday, May 17, 2011 9:13:46 PM

Post# of 103340

My decision on vetting this company could not be any non-personal in nature



i have no idea of what the above quote means

my comments in MY post pertain to expo's current mgmt
and expo's future mgmt

i don't see them as being one and the same
i don't view what was in place in 2009 as
necessarily being in place in 2011

let me be very clear here .. *I* have zero doubts
about the co.s *legitimacy* .. today i have zero
doubts about the co.s *survivability* .. i have zero
doubts about *current* mgmt's integrity and that what
has been stated publicly re: zero shares sold is indeed
FACT .. i have zero doubts that mgmt's *awareness* today
re: the efforts employed against their stock being manipulated
in 2009 and 2010 is *vastly* different from 2009 ... that is
the *war* i refer to

what i don't know .. is who is the new ceo
whether said ceo will hold restricted shares or common
and what the INTENT of the new ceo is in regards to ETC
and the co.s *future* .. business models *adjust* constantly

what is of *interest* to me .. is what is articulated by the
new ceo re: expo staying public vs. going private .. and how
capital will be accessed for ETC if *intent* is to keep the
co. *public* .. my vote for over a year has been to take the
co. *PRIVATE* .. and get off the toxic merry go round of the OTC

that is what matters to me as an exph shareholder of over 2.9 yrs

based on what is *articulated* by the new ceo post *transition*
determines on whether i remain an exph shareholder for another
2.9 years ~

==
4kids
all jmo



10/5/07 -- there are no coincidences here ...
oh and like many other longs .. not selling at this level --