InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 41
Posts 6161
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/19/2009

Re: banyon post# 108780

Tuesday, 05/17/2011 6:50:02 PM

Tuesday, May 17, 2011 6:50:02 PM

Post# of 111729
Your question is irrelevant for your purposes. The point is that whoever is running it and the promotional ones behind it are using deceit and not disclosing and that indicates BEHL fitting to the description of a scam. Not disclosing is just another form of deceit. The financial statements used deceit and are in at the very least very erroneous nature. The simple things that are required of a public company are not in compliance.

We're again talking about a .0001 toxic shell stock that has lost all of the original focus of the algae manufacturing business and has basically gone dark for about 5 months now (a common occurrence before a R/S). They went out of business with parts strewn around in a desert and the "algae industry" has long gone way ahead of any so called technology that they might of had (even in reality there was nothing that confirmed anything that BEHL said they had).

The business (used loosely here) has done nothing but produce promoters (with its own promotional site) and anyones "investment" to its demise with the projected and stated fact of dilution and "financing" that went nowhere to the "business" that was supposedly there. As far as what this shell might be in the future, they might as well make tee shirts or iron on pictures, it doesn't even matter at this point.

"Opinion" as you state IS THE STOCK MARKET and what it is based on. Especially the scammy pinks or there wouldn't be such dumb questions asked in order to try to get away from the facts of this shell, nor would there even be any existence of any low life promoter and fluff forward looking statement PRs. Nor would there be any CommonWealth of Nations, copy and paste pictures, constant "covering of tracks" editing (talk about blatent deceit).

BEHL is just four letters standing for the ticker, not standing for any real business. There is nothing to run other than sub par, sub pinky share selling business. We can go around all year about "prove it" and "prove it isn't" bs, but that in itself proves BEHL reeks of deception. Way too many things are not a matter of black and white when it comes to required documents of any public company. It doesn't matter to whether its opinion or not -- it is what it is.

Even though there has been many facts posted here and much available to anyone except the three monkeys, take it that I know for sure your answer, my sources have confirmed, and I'm not telling you, na, na, na. LOL