Is it hard to believe that there is more than one person who sees this company for what it is? I've challenged this board many times to refute the facts posted by us or that woman who wrote that scathing article. (her name escapes me)No one has refuted anything, not even the flawed business model. The best we get from the astute investors on this board is accusations that two posters may be one and the same.
I would like just one person to explain to me how this company will ever be profitable when their model is to grow via acquisitions by using 50% cash and 50% stock? It's not like these small mom and pop co's are accretive to earnings. Most of them are either losing money or making a small profit. Even if all of these acquired co's were profitable, Berrard is diluting the common stock quicker than any profits can keep up. This stock has over 150 million shares outstanding with rev's of only 63 million. Hope and prayer doesn't make you money in the market, proper Due Diligence will.
When this reverse merger was formed, the insiders consisting of Huizenga and Berrard's cronies and family members were issued over 50% of the shares outstanding. Nice!!
"Tough times don't last....tough people do"