Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. (fka SPNGQ)

[dpilon]

NEW Moskowitz E-MAIL: 'DO IT QUIETLY'

FBI likes to be NON TRANSPARENT.

Who is George Speranza's new 'WHO'?

"...Specifically, Speranza lied about when
he initially discussed creating the websites
for Spongetech, and WHO at
Spongetech asked him to establish the websites
and virtual offices..."
http://www.fbi.gov/newyork/press-releases/2011/marketing-company-executive-pleads-guilty-to-perjury-in-connection-with-investigation-of-spongetech-delivery-systems-inc

I asked George Speranza by e-mail be he didn't reply yet.

In his first testimony, the 'WHO' was Richard Heller.

Now, with FBI 'superb' NON transparent work, it can be anyone working or not working at SpongeTech. It can be me!

So, Who is the new 'WHO'?

- Frank Nicolois?
- Thomas Cavanagh?
- Jimmy Einsenberg?
- Avi Tepfer?
- Steven Moskowitz?
- Michael Metter?
- Me, David Pilon?
- Kaja Whitehouse
- Bruce Springstein?
- Donald Trump?
- Patrick Kelly of Harbor Enterprises?
- Frank Lazauskas?
- Myron Weiner?
- Peter Klein?
- Barry Kolevzon?
- Jack Schwartzberg?
- Bill Young?
- Avi Mirman
- Marcus Butler?
- Michael Harstein?
- Barry Honig?
- Carl Freer?
- Seth Shaw?
- Other?

David PATCH (patchman) says SETH SHAW may be the new 'WHO'

On his investigation web site, he said that Seth Shaw could very well be the one because he was deeply studied in the RISK and ATTACKS document he published. RISK ASSESSMENT document published by David PATCH:

http://www.investigatethesec.com/drupal-5.5/?q=node/908

http://www.investigatethesec.com/drupal-5.5/files/Risk_Assessment-Spongetech_1_of_2.pdf

http://www.investigatethesec.com/drupal-5.5/files/Risk_Assessment-Spongetech_2_of_2.pdf

----- Forwarded Message ---- 
 From: Steven Moskowitz <[e-mail]> 
 Date: Sun, May 16, 2010 at 7:56 AM 
 Subject: Re: Seth Shaw 
 To: [e-mail] 
  
 Nether he works when we need him he is close freind of mine  
 and we don't need IR right now when we do he will be back 
  
  
 ------------------------------- 
 From: David Pilon <[e-mail]> 
 To: Steven Moskowitz 
 Sent: Sun May 16 07:52:30 2010 
 Subject: Re: Seth Shaw 
  
 Why is Seth Shaw not employed by SpongeTech anymore? He threw  
 first pitch at Coors field last year so he must have been  
 important to SpongeTech! Is it because of current cash flow 
 problems, or because of "internal threat" problems, or other? 
  
  
 ------------------------------- 
 From: Steven Moskowitz <[e-mail]> 
 Date: Sun, May 16, 2010 at 7:48 AM 
 Subject: Re: Seth Shaw 
 To: [e-mail] 
  
 Correct 
  
  
 ------------------------------- 
 From: David Pilon <[e-mail]> 
 To: Steven Moskowitz 
 Sent: Sun May 16 07:47:49 2010 
 Subject: Re: Seth Shaw 
  
 OK. So, this "Risk Assessment" document was not requested by  
 SpongeTech, and was not produced on a request from SpongeTech,  
 correct? 
  
  
 ------------------------------- 
 From: Steven Moskowitz <[e-mail]> 
 Date: Sun, May 16, 2010 at 7:43 AM 
 Subject: Re: Seth Shaw 
 To: [e-mail] 
  
 No he is not but I know he is not a threat who ever put it  
 together tried to harm us 
  
  
 ------------------------------- 
 From: David Pilon <[e-mail]> 
 To: Steven Moskowitz 
 Sent: Sun May 16 07:41:30 2010 
 Subject: Re: Seth Shaw 
  
 Can you open links on your BlackBerry? -> http://www.investigatethesec.com/drupal-5.5/files/Risk_Assessment-Spongetech_1_of_2.pdf 
  
 On page 9, it says Seth Shaw (and two others) should be included  
 on SpongeTech's list of potential threats. 
  
 Is Seth Shaw still employed by SpongeTech? 
  
  
 ------------------------------- 
 From: Steven Moskowitz <[e-mail]> 
 Date: Sun, May 16, 2010 at 7:36 AM 
 Subject: Re: Seth Shaw 
 To: [e-mail] 
  
 Why 
  
  
 ------------------------------- 
 From: David Pilon <[e-mail]> 
 To: Steven Moskowitz 
 Sent: Sun May 16 07:36:29 2010 
 Subject: Seth Shaw 
  
 Hi Mr. Moskowitz, is Seth Shaw still employed by SpongeTech? 
 

Who is the new 'WHO'?

Is it Seth Shaw?

Consider the following statement by David Patch, made after we were discussing the Risk Assessment, and I [cowtown jay] questioned how it came to be in his possession. Well, badshah asked David about that the next day. Patch replied:

"The documents were delivered to me and others by an individual within Spongetech's INNER CIRCLE."

OK? So David Patch was inside SpongeTech's inner circle? Why?

----- Forwarded Message ---- 
 From: [e-mail] 
 To: David Pilon <[e-mail]> 
 Sent: Fri, May 6, 2011 5:37:47 PM 
 Subject: Re: The Shell 
  
 No do it quietly please respect that 
  
 Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry 
  
  
 ----------------- 
 From: David Pilon <[e-mail]> 
 Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 13:48:59 -0700 (PDT) 
 To: <[e-mail]> 
 Subject: Re: The Shell 
  
 Did you throw the towel resurrecting our number one brand in  
 sports company you founded? No pride? You lost interest?  
 Shareholders and former employees and reputation you don't care  
 anymore? 
  
  
 ----------------- 
 From: David Pilon <[e-mail]> 
 To: [e-mail] 
 Sent: Fri, May 6, 2011 12:47:21 PM 
 Subject: The Shell 
  
 Mr. Moskowitz, what can be done to have Silverman sell the  
 SpongeTech public shell? Prove he refused offers while the  
 company was still in Chapt.11?