InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 86
Posts 4055
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/14/2006

Re: rockie101 post# 32401

Thursday, 05/05/2011 5:57:13 PM

Thursday, May 05, 2011 5:57:13 PM

Post# of 42851
No new thoughts, however, I believe if PJ&S can provide a valuation as WMI-2 as being an active and running operating entity, rather than a run off entity as propose by WMI, I believe, we will be part of WMI-2 (shared with HUQ), rather than part of a liquidation trust. The addition of NOLs is also a good for preferreds.

A revaluation of WMI-2 as an active and running operating entity would/should be huge because I assume they were originally re insuring Wamu (and other) loans. This is my understanding, someone correct me if I am wrong about this.

There is also the FJR issue. If that comes into play, then equity control WMI-2.

This is based on if GSA is upheld.

Preferreds have a good chance and are the closest to being officially "in the money".


This is strictly my opinion.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.