calm down.
getting an outside opinion is great...one caveat, if you get 10 radiologists in a room and ask about one film, you'll often come back with 11 opinions. take it from someone who's been there both on the reading end and on the receiving end. that's why most of us read our own critical films on top of getting a radiologist's opinion.
your question, such as it was, was loaded and not terribly concise. sorry. kudos for trying - and kudos to kkg for putting his up there as well. soft pedaling was not the issue. bias was the issue.
educating yourself about the technology and about this company is great. all people interested in this stock should take the time to do so. yes, i want to know about this "stuff" and i haven't waited around for the hens on this board to educate me. many of the ultaBEARS who got crispy investing in this and losing big should have educated themselves way before betting the family farm. (educating themselves on the technology and on investing in penny stocks too.) instead, we're subject to a neverending stream of vitriol and blather. enough said.
re my personal opinion, not that you should care, but you can look back at my sporadic posts and you will see that i LONG ago stated i thought a pma would be better to prove this technology. i also understood why the company went the way it did, which seems to me to be a mistimed business decision based on old data regarding fda standards. (conspiracy theorists will say based on not wanting the scrutiny of trials.) a pma would do a lot to remove the subjective "we think it'll work well enough" and replace it with the objective "we compared it rigorously with the standard approaches and it works better". the trials would also help define the appropriate uses of this technology, something i've always been concerned about. finally, nothing works better to market your product than a well done trial. the company chose not to go that route - i believe largely because the breakaway product did not do so either. that's understandable...not optimal in my opinion...but understandable. for now i just have to wait until he either demonstrates something that i can evaluate myself (in some limited way), decides to do trials or goes bankrupt. all are possibilities...
finally, kkg is not the only expert on the board or in the world. we don't know his credentials, as we don't know yours or mine for that matter. dr fishman has credentials in academia a mile long which is why i highly doubt he'll entertain this nonsense for much longer. that said, if you're going to ask the guru a question, a well thought out, well constructed one would be more fruitful. even then, if you get an answer, you're getting one person's opinion and nothing more.
AI
