InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,509.01
(
0.62%
)
US TECH 100
19,460.00
(
0.95%
)
Dow Jones
39,331.85
(
0.41%
)
Brent Oil
86.55
(
0.12%
)
Bitcoin
60,900.76
(
-1.81%
)
Post# of 45574
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

zeninvestor32

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 260
Posts 1065
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/04/2004

zeninvestor32

Re: janice shell post# 41139

Sunday, 05/08/2005 12:02:52 AM

Sunday, May 08, 2005 12:02:52 AM

Post# of 45574
EASY

Frizzell would have either attended or been privy to the transcript, which would now be available to us unless the court sealed the transcript. Unless you're aware of sealed records (highly unlikely in a case of great transparency), there haven't been depositions. And if the depositions went so poorly that you would like to claim Frizzell is withholding them from us, then we would surely have seen the transcripts from the infinite wealth of naysayer forces by now.

So, any other bright thoughts? No, don't answer that. Seriously, I am going to bed now. Adios.

Z

As always, these are my personal opinions.

Hopefully nobody in here is investing anything but "fun" money that they can afford to gamble with.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up