DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[stakddek]

Somehow it seems to me that replying to a person who's every intent is evident in the name he's chosen to post under...

Well if you wish to give the favor of a reply to such an agenda, you are going to be bombarded with continual negative rhetoric that will highlight every flaw and every bad outcome that an imagination based in a negative agenda can create. If you reply to the nigtmare scenarios promulgated with any kind of "ilver lining" reply, or point out a any good development you are bombarded with a repetitious litany of deficencies that are designed to churn your stomach.

Apparently some posters are so intent on degrading the promise of DNAP and all the accomplishments and the hard work that has gained multiple affiliations and peer respect. That a poster would find it necessary to assume a name that in itself should be an affront to all the posters here is more than enough reason to ostracize that poster.

I have decided that a continual rehash of all the negative possibilities with no discussion of any favorable aspects by such a poster is not worth my effort to read.

I value the opinions of all posters here, and am willing to accept rational discussion about DNAP, warts and all. However I feel the continued barrage of absolute negativity from a moniker designed to deride the prime force and heart of DNAP is just not worth the bother to either read or reply to.

Stakddek